How Strategies and Challenges Affect the Realization of Local Original Revenue Target in the Laboratory UPTD of the Public Works and Public Housing Service of Cilacap Regency

Dyah Ayu Subekti; Kartini Kartini

doi:10.61132/ijems.v2i4.947

Authors

Dyah Ayu Subekti Islamic University of Indonesia
Kartini Kartini Islamic University of Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61132/ijems.v2i4.947

Keywords:

Local Original Income, Internal Strategy, External Challenges, Cash Flow, Laboratory UPTD'

Abstract

This study aims to analyze how internal strategies and external challenges can influence the achievement of Regional Original Revenue targets at the Laboratory Technical Implementation Unit (UPTD) of the Public Works and Public Housing Agency (Dinas Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat) of Cilacap Regency. The research object is the performance of the Laboratory Technical Implementation Unit (UPTD), a technical unit providing construction material testing services, which directly contributes to Regional Original Revenue in Cilacap Regency. The qualitative approach employed a case study method, and data collection techniques included interviews, observation, and documentation. The sample in this study was obtained purposively. The results indicate that internal strategies focused on superior testing methods such as core drilling, abrasion, and concrete compressive strength have been conducted. However, limited equipment, human resources, and the lack of accreditation are major obstacles. On the other hand, external challenges include the lack of updated Regional Regulation tariff regulations, the absence of formal obligations for the use of laboratory services for regional budget projects, and a saturated local market. These findings provide important implications for the Laboratory Technical Implementation Unit (UPTD) in emphasizing policy revisions, increasing internal capacity, and strengthening inter-agency coordination to increase Regional Original Revenue realization.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Nasir, M. S. (2019). Analisis sumber-sumber pendapatan asli daerah setelah satu dekade otonomi daerah. Jurnal Dinamika Ekonomi Pembangunan, 2(1), 30–45. https://doi.org/10.14710/jdep.2.1.30-45

Gedeona, H. T. (2008). Kajian perbandingan ketidakseimbangan fiskal vertikal di Indonesia dan Jepang. Fiscal Decentralization: A Comparative Study on Imbalances of Vertical Fiscal in Indonesia and Japan, 34, 167–193.

Adolph, R. (2016). Pengelolaan arus kas dan kas perusahaan. Vol. 10, 1–23.

Utami, S., & Iskandar, D. D. (2021). Flypaper effect terhadap determinan belanja daerah dan determinan pendapatan asli daerah pada 34 provinsi di Indonesia tahun 2013-2018 (Two Stage Least Square). Jurnal Dinamika Ekonomi Pembangunan, 3(3), 202–218. https://doi.org/10.14710/jdep.3.3.202-218

Longobardi, E., Porcelli, F., & Zanardi, A. (2013). Fiscal decentralization and growth. Vol. 06, 3–5.

Oates, W. E. (2003). An essay on fiscal federalism. Fiscal Federalism and European Economic Integration, XXXVII, 13–47. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203987254

Smoke, P. (2015). Rethinking decentralization: Assessing challenges to a popular public sector reform. Public Administration and Development, 35(2), 97–112. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1703

Murtianingsih, T., & Hastuti. (2020). Analisis laporan arus kas untuk menilai kinerja keuangan pada industri tekstil dan garmen yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI) periode 2016-2018. Prosiding The 11th Industrial Research Workshop and National Seminar, 833–839.

Adolph, R. (2016). Pengelolaan arus kas dan kas perusahaan. 1–23.

Fajarwati, D. (2017). Informasi bagi serikat pekerja di wilayah Kabupaten/Kota Bekasi. Journal Optimal, 1(2), 23–30.

Ramadhan, A., Rahim, M. S. R., Kom, S., Kom, M., & Utami, N. N. (2023). Teori pendapatan (Studi kasus: Pendapatan petani Desa Medan Krio). Tahta Media, 02(2), 34–37.

Krismiyati, K., Yanuarisa, Y., Sari, A. L., Kristian, I., & Kuswandi, D. (2023). Local government budget management strategies for optimizing regional revenue. Ministrate: Jurnal Birokrasi dan Pemerintahan Daerah, 5(3), 352–361. https://doi.org/10.15575/jbpd.v5i3.30650

Salomo, R. V., & Rahmayanti, K. P. (2023). Progress and institutional challenges on local governments performance accountability system reform in Indonesia. Sage Open, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231196659

Cortázar, J. C., Fuenzalida, J., & Lafuente, M. (2016). Merit-based selection of public managers: Better public sector performance? Peru: Inter-American Development Bank.