Comparison of Stock Market Reactions to the 2024 Elections: Event Study Analysis of the IDX Sectoral Index
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61132/ijems.v2i3.932Keywords:
2024 Elections, Abnormal Return, Event Study, Sectoral Index, Trading Volume ActivityAbstract
This study examines the capital market reaction at the sectoral level to the 2024 General Election in Indonesia, with the aim of providing deeper insight into how political events influence different industries. Using an event study methodology, the analysis is conducted over a 10-trading-day window surrounding February 14, 2024—the official election date—covering five days before and after the event. The research focuses on six major sectoral indices listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX), namely Energy, Consumer Cyclicals, Financials, Basic Materials, Industrials, and Technology.Market reaction is measured through two primary dimensions: (1) changes in price valuation, represented by abnormal returns (AR), and (2) shifts in investor activity, measured through Trading Volume Activity (TVA), operationalized as the turnover ratio. Abnormal returns capture the extent to which price changes deviate from expected normal performance, while TVA reflects the level of investor engagement in each sector during the event window.To evaluate differences in market reaction across sectors, the Kruskal–Wallis test is applied for abnormal returns due to non-normal data distribution, and Welch’s ANOVA is used for TVA to account for heterogeneity of variances. The results reveal no statistically significant differences in abnormal returns across the six sectors, suggesting that price adjustments to election-related information occur uniformly across the market, reflecting a degree of informational efficiency. However, the analysis of TVA shows a highly significant difference among sectors. A Games–Howell post-hoc test further indicates that the Energy and Consumer Cyclicals sectors experienced notably higher trading activity compared to other sectors, especially the Financials sector, which recorded the lowest investor engagement.
Downloads
References
Ball, R., & Brown, P. (1968). An empirical evaluation of accounting income numbers. Journal of Accounting Research, 6(2), 159–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/2490232
Bodie, Z., Kane, A., & Marcus, A. J. (2014). Investments (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Brown, S. J., & Warner, J. B. (1985). Using daily stock returns: The case of event studies. Journal of Financial Economics, 14(1), 3–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(85)90042-X
Campbell, J. Y., Lo, A. W., & MacKinlay, A. C. (1997). The econometrics of financial markets. Princeton University Press.
Efficient Market Hypothesis. (n.d.). In The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Strategic Management. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-94848-2_204-1
Fama, E. F. (1970). Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work. The Journal of Finance, 25(2), 383–417. https://doi.org/10.2307/2325486
Fama, E. F., Fisher, L., Jensen, M. C., & Roll, R. (1969). The adjustment of stock prices to new information. International Economic Review, 10(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.2307/2525569
Grossman, S. J., & Stiglitz, J. E. (1980). On the impossibility of informationally efficient markets. The American Economic Review, 70(3), 393–408. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1805228
Michaely, R., & Roberts, M. R. (2012). Corporate dividend policies: Lessons from private firms. The Review of Financial Studies, 25(3), 711–746. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhr108
O’Hara, M. (1995). Market microstructure theory. Blackwell Publishers.
Pastor, L., & Veronesi, P. (2012). Uncertainty about government policy and stock prices. The Journal of Finance, 67(4), 1219–1264. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2012.01746.x
Ross, S. A. (1977). The determination of financial structure: The incentive-signalling approach. The Bell Journal of Economics, 8(1), 23–40. https://doi.org/10.2307/3003485
Sharpe, W. F., Alexander, G. J., & Bailey, J. V. (1999). Investments (6th ed.). Prentice Hall.
Vega, C. (2006). Stock price reaction to public and private information. Journal of Financial Economics, 82(1), 103–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2005.07.011
Wooldridge, J. M. (2016). Introductory econometrics: A modern approach (6th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Economics and Management Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


