ESG and Financial Distress in Indonesian Non-Financial Firms: The Moderating Role of Cost of Debt
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61132/ijems.v2i3.907Keywords:
Cost of Debt, ESG Performance, Financial Distress, Interest Coverage Ratio, Panel Regression analysisAbstract
This study examines how Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) performance influences financial distress, incorporating cost of debt as a moderating variable. Financial distress is proxied by the Interest Coverage Ratio (ICR), reflecting a firm’s capacity to satisfy interest payments. The empirical sample consists of 655 firm-year observations of non-financial companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange from 2014 to 2023. Panel regression with fixed effects and heteroskedasticity-consistent estimation (Panel EGLS with cross-section weights) is employed to analyze the data. Results indicate that ESG performance exerts a positive and statistically significant effect on ICR (β = 0.1189; p < 0.01), implying that firms with robust ESG practices are better able to service their debt and thus face lower financial distress. Additionally, the interaction term between ESG and cost of debt yields a negative and significant coefficient (β = −0.9714; p < 0.05), suggesting that elevated financing costs attenuate the beneficial impact of ESG on financial resilience. These findings are consistent with stakeholder theory, which advocates that proactive engagement with stakeholders enhances corporate stability, and trade-off theory, which underscores the necessity of balancing debt advantages against financial risk. This research contributes to the literature by demonstrating the conditional effect of cost of debt on the ESG–financial distress nexus. From a managerial perspective, the study underscores the importance of integrating ESG initiatives with cost-efficient funding strategies to mitigate financial distress risk and foster sustainable, long-term value creation.
Downloads
References
G. N. Ahmad, “Analysis of Financial Distress in Indonesian Stock Exchange,” Rev. Integr. Bus. Econ. Res., vol. 2, no. 2, 2013. [Online]. Available: www.sibresearch.org
T. Al Barrak, K. Chebbi, A. A. Aljughaiman, and M. Albarrak, “Exploring the Interplay between Sustainability and Debt Costs in an Emerging Market: Does Financial Distress Matter?,” Sustainability (Switzerland), vol. 15, no. 12, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129273
E. I. Altman, E. Hotchkiss, and W. Wang, Corporate Financial Distress, Restructuring, and Bankruptcy. Hoboken: Wiley, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119541929
C. F. Alves and L. L. Meneses, “ESG scores and debt costs: Exploring indebtedness, agency costs, and financial system impact,” Int. Rev. Financ. Anal., vol. 94, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103240
D. Anderson and F. Wu, “Environmental performance, cost of debt, and corporate default risk. International Evidence,” J. Bank. Finance, vol. 135, 2021.
N. Apergis, T. Poufinas, and A. Antonopoulos, “ESG scores and cost of debt,” Energy Econ., vol. 112, 2022.
S. Bao and T. Nguyen, “Board independence, cost of debt, and bankruptcy risk in emerging markets,” Emerg. Mark. Rev., vol. 51, 2022.
F. Barboza and E. Altman, “Predicting financial distress in Latin American companies: A comparative analysis of logistic regression and random forest models,” N. Am. J. Econ. Finance, vol. 72, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2024.102158
F. Bellandi, “Further Developments of the Financially-ESG Sustainable Growth Matrix,” Int. J. Bus. Manag., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 112, 2022. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v17n2p112
D. Chen and Y. Ran, “Relationship between Regulatory Environment, Financing Constraints, and Corporate Risk-Taking in Tourism Industry,” Finance Res. Lett., 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2025.107325
M. Choudhury, “Signaling Theory,” J. Account. Bus. Manag., vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 98, 2024. https://doi.org/10.31966/jabminternational.v31i2.1199
B. L. Connelly, S. T. Certo, R. D. Ireland, and C. R. Reutzel, “Signaling Theory: A Review and Assessment,” J. Manag., vol. 37, pp. 39–67, 2011.
D. Yunhendri and B. Muctar, Environmental Economics. Yogyakarta: Deepublish, 2021.
C. Del Gesso and R. N. Lodhi, “Theories underlying environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosure: a systematic review of accounting studies,” J. Account. Lit., 2024. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAL-08-2023-0143
E. Ekawati, N. P. G. Rahmawati, and I. W. Kusuma, Green Finance in Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada Univ. Press, 2023.
T. H. Fauzi, “The Effect of Environmental Performance on Firm Value with Mediating Role of Financial Performance in Manufacturing Companies in Indonesia,” Acad. J. Interdiscip. Stud., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 256–265, 2022. https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2022-0081
R. E. Freeman, J. S. Harrison, A. C. Wicks, B. L. Parmar, and S. de Colle, Stakeholder Theory: The State of the Art. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2010.
R. E. Freeman, A. C. Wicks, and B. Parmar, “Stakeholder Theory and ‘The Corporate Objective Revisited,’” Organ. Sci., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 364–369, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0066
L. Fu, D. Boehe, and M. Aktaruzzaman, “Culture and Mixed Signals: Does ESG Reduce Risk Everywhere?,” Acad. Manag. Proc., vol. 2021, no. 1, 2021. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2021.10306abstract
T. A. Gumganti, Moeljadi, and E. S. Srti, Financial Research Methods. Media Discourse Partners, 2018.
A. Gutterman, “Stakeholder Theory,” SSRN Electron. J., 2023. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4387595
P. Hajek and M. Munk, “Corporate financial distress prediction using the risk-related information content of annual reports,” Inf. Process. Manag., vol. 61, no. 5, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2024.103820
M. Helmold, Financial PM, pp. 131–148, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20534-8_10
Hery, Financial Statement Analysis. Grammar, 2018.
D. Z. Huang, “Environmental, social and governance factors and assessing firm value: valuation, signalling and stakeholder perspec-tives,” Account. Finance, vol. 62, no. S1, pp. 1983–2010, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12849
G. N. T. Huong, L. A. N. Thi, and N. N. Thu, “Impact of Capital Structure and Debt Characteristics on Default Risk of Listed Real Estate Firms in Vietnam,” pp. 327–344, 2023. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-348-1_25
E. Irianingsih, G. N. Ahmad, A. D. Buchdadi, and C. Author, “The Influence of Environmental, Social and Governance and the Risk of Financial Information Disclosure on Investment Efficiency in Environmentally Sensitive Industrial Companies in ASEAN 5 Period 2018–2022,” Int. J. Econ. Manag. Account., vol. 12, pp. 943–952, 2024. https://doi.org/10.47353/ijema.v1i12.134
Jogiyanto, Business Research Methodology. Yogyakarta: Andi, 2024.
M. T. Lee, R. L. Raschke, and A. S. Krishen, “Signaling green! firm ESG signals in an interconnected environment that promote brand valuation,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 138, pp. 1–11, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.08.061
S. F. Lehenchuk, O. V. Oliinyk, and T. O. Zavalii, “Institutional signaling with the help of ESG reporting,” Probl. Theory Methodol. Account. Control Anal., vol. 2, no. 58, pp. 24–31, 2024. https://doi.org/10.26642/pbo-2024-2(58)-24-31
M. K. Linnenluecke, “Environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance in the context of multinational business research,” Multinatl. Bus. Rev., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1108/MBR-11-2021-0148
A. Madrid-Guijarro, D. García-Pérez-de-Lema, and H. van Auken, “An analysis of non-financial factors associated with financial dis-tress,” Entrepr. Reg. Dev., vol. 23, no. 3–4, pp. 159–186, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985620903233911
Q. Meng, X. Zheng, and S. Wang, “Corporate governance and financial distress in China: a multi-dimensional nonlinear study based on machine learning,” Pac.-Basin Finance J., vol. 88, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2024.102549
G. A. Mousa, “Legitimacy Theory and Environmental Practices: Short Notes,” Int. J. Bus. Stat. Anal., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 41–53, 2015. https://doi.org/10.12785/ijbsa/020104
G. O’Donovan, “Environmental disclosures in the annual report: Extending the applicability and predictive power of legitimacy theory,” Account. Audit. Account. J., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 344–371, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570210435870
OECD, G20/OECD Principles of Corporate Governance 2023. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1787/ed750b30-en
D. J. Olateju, O. A. Olateju, S. V. Adeoye, and I. I. Suleiman, “A critical review of the application of the legitimacy theory to corporate social responsibility,” Int. J. Manag. Stud. Res., vol. 9, no. 3, 2021.
L. S. Peng and M. Isa, “Environmental, social and governance (ESG) practices and performance in shariah firms: Agency or stakeholder theory?,” Asian Acad. Manag. J. Account. Finance, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1–34, 2020. https://doi.org/10.21315/aamjaf2020.16.1.1
S. H. Penman, Financial Statement Analysis and Security Valuation, 5th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2013.
F. Priandhana, “The Effect of Environmental Social and Governance Risks on the Company’s Financial Performance (Study on Companies in the IDXESGL Index),” BECOSS J., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 59–63, 2022. https://doi.org/10.21512/becossjournal.v4i1.7797
T. Prihadi, Analysis of Financial Statements. Grammar, 2022.
L. Ruan and H. Liu, “Environmental, social, governance activities and firm performance: evidence from China,” Sustainability (Switzer-land), vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 1–16, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020767
C. Shang and J. Harford, “Corporate governance quality and the cost of debt: The role of default risk,” Int. Rev. Financ. Anal., 2020.
Y. Shi, S. Zheng, P. Xiao, H. Zhen, and T. Wu, “ESG performance and cost of debt,” China J. Account. Res., 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjar.2024.100390
Y. Song, R. Li, Z. Zhang, and J.-M. Sahut, “ESG performance and financial distress prediction of energy enterprises,” Finance Res. Lett., vol. 65, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.105546
M. Srećković, D. Hartmann, S. Schützenhofer, and A. Kotecki, “Bridging theory and practice: Stakeholder insights on circular economy in the building life cycle,” Energy Reports, vol. 12, pp. 3291–3301, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2024.09.014
Sugiarto, Business Research Methodology. Yogyakarta: Andi Publisher, 2017.
G. Talan, G. D. Sharma, V. Pareira, and G. W. Muschert, “From ESG to holistic value addition: Rethinking sustainable investment from the lens of stakeholder theory,” Int. Rev. Econ. Finance, vol. 96, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2024.103530
V. Q. Trinh, H. H. Trinh, T. Li, and X. V. Vo, “Climate change exposure, financial development, and the cost of debt: Evidence from EU countries,” J. Financ. Stab., vol. 74, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2024.101315
United Nations, Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, UN Doc. A/RES/70/1, 2015.
J. H. van Binsbergen, J. R. Graham, and J. Yang, “The Cost of Debt,” SSRN Electron. J., 2010. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.968258
C. Wang, “The Relationship between ESG Performance and Corporate Performance - Based on Stakeholder Theory,” SHS Web Conf., vol. 190, 03022, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202419003022
X. Wang and L. Yao, “Can enterprise ESG practices ease their financing constraints,” Hell., vol. 10, 2023.
R. Jordan and D. Westerfield, Fundamentals of Corporate Finance, Std. Ed. 2013.
T. Yeh, Y. Xiao, and S. J. Daniel, “Stakeholder influences on management control systems for ESG governance and reporting in the global automotive industry,” J. Corp. Account. Finance, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 103–120, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcaf.22671
W. Zhang and Y. Li, “Bankruptcy risk, cost of debt, and corporate investment decisions: Evidence from panel data,” J. Corp. Finance, 2023.
J. Zhao, J. Ouenniche, and J. De Smedt, “Survey, classification and critical analysis of the literature on corporate bankruptcy and financial distress prediction,” Mach. Learn. Appl., vol. 15, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mlwa.2024.100527
G. Zhou, L. Liu, and S. Luo, “Sustainable development, ESG performance and company market value: Mediating effect of financial performance,” Bus. Strategy Environ., vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 3371–3387, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3089
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Economics and Management Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
