Validation of The Business Model of IOT Digital Industry-Class Services
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61132/ijems.v2i4.894Keywords:
Internet of Things (IoT), Value Proposition Canvas, Product Validation, Educational Technology, Skills GapAbstract
This study investigates KIDI IoT, an educational service by PT Telkom Indonesia designed to bridge the skills gap between Vocational High School (SMK) graduates and the demands of the Industry 4.0 workforce. The primary objective was to assess the extent to which the KIDI IoT service fulfilled the requirements of educators and learners to substantiate its value proposition. A qualitative, exploratory methodology was employed utilizing in-depth interviews and the Value Proposition Canvas (VPC) framework for analysis. The outcomes demonstrate how effectively the program's project-based, experiential approach increases user motivation and offers a practical, industry-relevant learning environment. The service successfully generates the desired customer benefits. A major customer pain point that the current model ignores is that participants often expressed that the two-day offline training period was insufficient to help them master the material or build their confidence for working independently. This led to a significant misalignment. The KIDI IoT value proposition is fundamentally strong and well-regarded; however, the study concludes that its implementation necessitates improvement, particularly through the provision of more specialized teacher training and an extended training duration, to ensure sustained impact and skill acquisition.
Downloads
References
Afifa, A. N. (2024). Analisis validasi produk menggunakan value proposition canvas (Studi Kasus: Startup D’cetak). Skripsi, S1 Administrasi Bisnis, Universitas Telkom, Bandung, Indonesia. https://repository.telkomuniversity.ac.id/home/catalog/id/209172/
Al-Balushi, S. M., & Al-Aamri, S. S. (2014). The effect of environmental science projects on students' environmental knowledge and science attitudes. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 23(3), 213–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2014.927167
Almeida, M., Abreu, A., & Dias, J. (2020). Building blocks for the development of an IoT business model. International Journal of Online Biomedical Engineering, 16(12), 4–17. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijoe.v16i12.16480
Ashton, K. (2009, June 22). That ‘Internet of Things’ thing. RFID Journal. http://www.rfidjournal.com/articles/view?4986
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: SAGE Publications.
Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2010.10782551
Fauzy, R., & Ghina, A. (2021). Desain proposisi nilai pada startup bidang pendidikan (Studi pada startup Tutuo). Tugas Akhir, S1 Teknik Industri, Universitas Telkom, Bandung, Indonesia. https://repository.telkomuniversity.ac.id/pustaka/175507/desain-proposisi-nilai-pada-startup-bidang-pendidikan-studi-pada-startup-tutuo-.html
Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001
Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions. In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.), The Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs (pp. 3–21). San Francisco, CA, USA: Pfeiffer.
Holubova, R. (2008). Effective teaching methods—Project-based learning in physics. US-China Education Review, 5(12), 1548–6613. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED504949.pdf
Ikävalko, H., Pihkala, T., & Turkama, P. (2018). Value creation in the Internet of Things: Mapping business models and ecosystem roles. In Proceedings of the XXIX ISPIM Innovation Conference (pp. 1–13). Stockholm, Sweden. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323923388_Value_Creation_in_the_Internet_of_Things_Mapping_Business_Models_and_Ecosystem_Roles
Morris, R., De Bruin, A., & Heller, B. (2015). Business models for the Internet of Things. In 2015 International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC) (pp. 1–8). Belfast, UK. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE.2015.7438686
Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. (2016). Instruksi Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 9 Tahun 2016 tentang revitalisasi sekolah menengah kejuruan dalam rangka peningkatan kualitas dan daya saing sumber daya manusia Indonesia. Jakarta, Indonesia. https://jdih.setkab.go.id/PUUdoc/174987/Inpres_Nomor_9_Tahun_2016.pdf
Sugiyono. (2014). Metode penelitian pendidikan pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Taufiqurrohman, M. R., & Hasbi, I. (2024). Product validation analysis using value proposition canvas at Nominus startup. Skripsi, S1 Administrasi Bisnis, Universitas Telkom, Bandung, Indonesia. https://openlibrarypublications.telkomuniversity.ac.id/index.php/management/article/view/23717
Wecht, C., Rüping, S., & Böhm, K. (2021). Design method using extended business model canvas for IoT platforms. In 2021 IEEE 25th International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC) (pp. 1–10). Gold Coast, Australia. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDOC52215.2021.00010
Wibowo, M. D. A., & Prabowo, F. S. A. (2022). Validasi value proposition pada startup A-Tani. Tugas Akhir, S1 Teknik Industri, Universitas Telkom, Bandung, Indonesia. https://repositori.telkomuniversity.ac.id/home/catalog/id/198777/slug/validasi-value-proposition-pada-startup-a-tani.html
Zaini, N. (2024). Implementasi Internet of Things (IoT) pada teknologi pendidikan 5.0: Menghubungkan peserta didik dan lingkungan pembelajaran. In Prosiding KONAMI (Konferensi Nasional Mitra FISIP). https://doi.org/10.19184/konami.v1i1.928
Zeichner, K. M. (2010). Rethinking the connections between campus courses and field experiences in college- and university-based teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1–2), 89–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487109347671
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Economics and Management Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
