Whistleblowing Behavior Model and Social Influence : A Systematic Literature Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61132/ijems.v2i1.440Keywords:
Compliance, Conformity, Governance, Obedience, Organizational Ethics, Social Influence, WhistleblowingAbstract
Whistleblowing is a vital mechanism for exposing unethical practices and ensuring accountability in organizations. This systematic literature review explores the interplay between the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) and social influence factors—conformity, compliance, and obedience—in shaping whistleblowing behaviour. The review examines empirical and theoretical studies from 2004 to 2024 to identify how TPB constructs (attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioural control) integrate with social influence dynamics to influence the intention and action of whistleblowing. The findings highlight that attitudes toward whistleblowing, shaped by personal ethics and organizational culture, significantly influence individuals’ willingness to report misconduct. Subjective norms, reflecting the perceived social pressure to act or remain silent, often intersect with conformity and compliance, either encouraging or deterring whistleblowing. Perceived behavioural control, influenced by organizational support structures and fear of retaliation, determines the feasibility of acting. The role of obedience to authority emerges as a double-edged sword, where supportive leadership fosters whistleblowing while hierarchical pressures discourage it. Furthermore, the review underscores the importance of ethical climates and whistle-blower protection mechanisms in mitigating the negative impact of social pressures. It also identifies gaps in existing research, including the limited exploration of whistleblowing in diverse cultural contexts and the lack of longitudinal studies examining long-term impacts.
This study contributes to the literature by providing an integrated framework that combines TPB and social influence theories to understand whistleblowing behaviour. It offers practical insights for policymakers and organizational leaders to design interventions that encourage ethical reporting and protect whistle blowers.
Downloads
References
on whistleblowing intention in Pakistani banks: The indirect effects of organisational cynicism and religiosity (Master's thesis). Bournemouth University.
Batolas, D. (2021). A social psychological study of whistleblowing (Doctoral dissertation). Aarhus University.
Bergemann, P. (2024). How social influence affects reporting: Toward an integration of crime reporting, whistleblowing, and denunciation. Annual Review of Sociology, 50(1), 209–228. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-030222-013736
Bishop, C. C. (2013). The impact of social influence pressure on CFO judgments (Unpublished doctoral dissertation).
Black, E. L., Burton, F. G., & Cieslewicz, J. K. (2022). Improving ethics: Extending the theory of planned behaviour to include moral disengagement. Journal of Business Ethics, 181(4), 897–914. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04896-z
Cai, H., Zhu, L., & Jin, X. (2023). Construed organizational ethical climate and whistleblowing behaviour: The moderated mediation effect of person–organization value congruence and ethical leader behaviour. Behavioural Sciences, 14(4), 293.
Capuano, C., & Chekroun, P. (2023). A systematic review of research on conformity. International Review of Social Psychology.
Cialdini, R. B., & Goldstein, N. J. (2004). Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 591–621.
Culiberg, B., & Mihelič, K. K. (2017). The evolution of whistleblowing studies: A critical review and research agenda. Journal of Business Ethics, 146(4), 787–803. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3237-0
Curtis, M. B., & Taylor, E. Z. (2009). Whistleblowing in public accounting: Influence of identity disclosure, situational context, and personal characteristics. Accounting and the Public Interest, 9(1), 191–220. https://doi.org/10.2308/api.2009.9.1.191
Curtis, M. B., Robertson, J. C., Cockrell, R. C., & Fayard, L. D. (2021). Peer ostracism as a sanction against wrongdoers and whistle-blowers. Journal of Business Ethics, 174(2), 333–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04596-0
Defiantoro, D., & Mayasari, I. (2024). Personal factors affecting whistleblowing among public sector employees. Dinasti International Journal of Economics, Finance & Accounting, 5(1), 9–22. https://doi.org/10.38035/dijefa.v5i1.2314
Dungan, J., Waytz, A., & Young, L. (2015). The psychology of whistleblowing. Current Opinion in Psychology, 6, 129–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.07.005
Eaton, T., & Akers, M. (2007). Whistleblowing and good governance. The CPA Journal, 77(6), 66–71.
Farmer, T. M. (2022). Moral obligation and social influence predictors of compliance (Doctoral dissertation). Walden University.
Fawole, T. S., & Fasua, H. K. (2024). Effective whistle-blowing mechanisms in the public sector. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(12), 3718.
Gibson, S. (2019). Obedience without orders: Expanding social psychology's conception of 'obedience.' British Journal of Social Psychology, 58(1), 241–259.
Guggenheim, L., & Laméris, J. (2023). Whistleblowing paradigms. Collabra: Psychology, 9(1), 87493.
Kartika, K., Utami, D., Sri, N. P., Mimba, H., Rasmini, N. K., & Widanaputra, A. A. G. P. (2018). The effect of attitude toward the behaviour, subjective norm, and perceived behavioural control on whistleblowing intention. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 9(18), 1–5.
Kitchenham, B., & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering (Technical Report EBSE 2007-001). Keele University and Durham University.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Economics and Management Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.