Leveraging Digital Transformation for Performance Management: A Case Study on E-Sakip Implementation in Government Institutions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61132/ijems.v1i4.237Keywords:
Digital Transformation, Performance Management, E-SAKIP, Government Agencies, Public Service DeliveryAbstract
The integration of digital transformation into government agencies' performance management has become essential in enhancing public service delivery, efficiency, and accountability. This study focuses on implementing the Electronic System for Government Agency Performance Accountability (E-SAKIP) in Indonesia as a case study of digital transformation. The research employs a qualitative approach with a case study design to explore the effectiveness, challenges, and impact of E-SAKIP on performance management. The findings indicate that E-SAKIP has significantly improved transparency and efficiency in government operations, reducing time and costs associated with performance reporting by up to 70%. However, challenges such as inadequate infrastructure, resistance to change, and insufficient training for government employees have hindered its full potential. The study underscores the need for ongoing support, including enhanced infrastructure, continuous training, and stronger leadership to ensure successful digital transformation. These insights offer valuable recommendations for further development of E-SAKIP and similar systems in other government contexts.
Downloads
References
Achievement in 2021. In Bappenas (Vol. 11, Issue 1). https://sdgs.bappenas.go.id/website/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/LAPORAN-SD GS-2021.pdf
APJII. (2024). APJII Number of Indonesian Internet Users Reached 221 Million People.
Bappenas. (2022). Annual Report on Government Agency Performance Accountability System.
Bekti, H. (2022). the Role of Innovation in Improving Public Administration Efficiency. Infokum Journal, 10(5), 1391-1398. http://infor.seaninstitute.org/index.php/infokum/index
BPS. (2022). Indonesian Telecommunication Statistics (T. and P. Directorate of Financial Statistics (ed.)). BPS. https://webapi.bps.go.id/
Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies. W. Norton Company.
Budiarta, I. G. (2020). Analysis of the Effect of Information Systems on Government Agency Performance. Scientific Journal of Management and Business, 9(2), 123-134.
Central Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Public Satisfaction Survey on Public Services. National Development Agency. (2021). Report on the Implementation of SDG/SDGS
Corruption Eradication Commission. (2021). Survey of Public Trust in Government Agencies.
Financial and Development Supervisory Agency. (2020). Government Agency Performance Research.
Goh, J. M., Chua, C. E Tan, A. (2020). Digital Transformation in Public Sector: A Review of the Literature. International Journal of Public Administration, 43(12), 1069-1080.
Government of Kabupaten Y. (2022). Performance Report of the Government of District Y.
https://www.apjii.or.id/berita/d/apjii-jumlah-pengguna-internet-indonesia-tembus-221-juta-orang
Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading the change: Why Transformation Efforts Fail. Harvard Business Review, 10(5), 215. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315637266-15
LAN. (2020). Government Agency Accountability Study.
LAN. (2022). Study on Constraints in the Use of E-Sakip in Government Agencies.
Mardiasmo. (2018). Public Sector Accounting. Andi Publisher.
McKinsey Global Institute. (2020). The Future of Work: The Impact of Technology on Jobs.
McKinsey. (2020). The Future of Government: Digital Transformation. https://www.mckinsey.com
Ministry of Health of the Republic of Indonesia. (2022). Ministry of Health 2022 Performance Report.
National Development Planning Agency. (2021). Evaluation Report on the Implementation of Digital Systems in the Regions.
National Development Strategic Plan 2022-2024. (2021).
OECD. (2020). Digital Government Review of Indonesia: Towards the Digital Transformation of the Public Sector.
PANRB. (2014). Minister of PANRB Regulation No. 53 of 2014 concerning General Guidelines for Performance Management of Government Agencies.
PANRB. (2021a). Annual Performance Report.
PANRB. (2021b). E-Sakip Implementation Guidelines. Jakarta: Kemenpan RB.
PANRB. (2022a). E-Sakip Annual Report. Jakarta: Ministry of PANRB.
PANRB. (2022b). E-Sakip Annual Report.
RI, O. (2020). Growing Community Participation in Public Service Oversight. https://ombudsman.go.id/artikel/r/artikel--menumbuhkan-partisipasi-masyarakat- dalam-pengawasan-pelayanan-publik
State Civil Service Agency. (2021). Research Report on the Use of Information Technology in Civil Servant Performance Management.
United Nations. (2020). Digital Government in the Time of COVID-19. https://www.un.org
University of Indonesia. (2021). Research on Employee Adaptation to E-Sakip.
Westerman, G., Bonnet, D., & McAfee, A. (2014a). Leading Digital: Turning Technology into Business Transformation. Harvard Business Review Press.
Westerman, G., Bonnet, D., & McAfee, A. (2014b). Leading Digital: Turning Technology into Business Transformation. Harvard Business Review Press.
WorldBank. (2020). Good Governance and Development: The Role of Transparency and Accountability.
WorldBank. (2021). Digital Government: A Global Perspective.
WorldBank. (2024). Skills and Workforce Development. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/skillsdevelopment
X City Education Office. (2022). Performance report of the education office.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 International Journal of Economics and Management Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
