The Role of GDP in Changing the Influence of Enviromental and Politic on SDG

Authors

  • Anum Nuryani Universitas Pamulang
  • Anggun Anggraini Universitas Pamulang
  • Andika Prasetya Universitas Pamulang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61132/ijems.v1i1.1022

Keywords:

ASEAN, Environmental, GDP, Politics

Abstract

Amidst the current changing global conditions, it is important for a country to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) to face challenges in sustainable development, social inequality, and strengthen economic and environmental resilience. This study aims to analyze the influence of environmental performance and political stability on the SDG scores of ASEAN countries for the 2020-2024 period, moderated by economic growth. Researchers used a quantitative method, processed using multiple linear regression with SPSS. The regression process was conducted twice, before and after using moderating variables. The findings suggest that economic growth can alter the influence of environmental performance and political stability on SDG scores. Political stability has a positive impact on the SDGs after economic growth has moderated. While environmental performance has a negative impact after being moderated by economic growth. Economic growth promotes political stability and sustainable growth. Conversely, with high growth, improvements in environmental performance are indicated to shift priorities from sustainability to exploitation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2012). Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. Crown Business.

Adrangi, B., & Kerr, L. (2022). Sustainable development indicators and their relationship to GDP: Evidence from emerging economies. Sustainability, 14(2), 658. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020658

Brundtland, G. H. (1987). Our common future: Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development. Oxford University Press.

Dasgupta, P. (2021). The economics of biodiversity: The Dasgupta review. HM Treasury.

Esty, D. C., & Porter, M. E. (2019). Measuring national environmental performance and its determinants. Environmental and Resource Economics, 74(2), 227–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-019-00380-y

Fukuda-Parr, S., & Muchhala, B. (2020). The Southern origins of sustainable development goals: Ideas, actors, aspirations. World Development, 126, 104706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104706

Gazi, M. A. I., Islam, H., Islam, M. A., Karim, R., Momo, S. M., & Senathirajah, A. R. B. S. (2024). Unlocking sustainable development in East Asia Pacific and South Asia: An econometric exploration of ESG initiatives. Sustainable Environment, 10(1), 2366558.

Ghozali, I. (2018). Aplikasi analisis multivariate dengan program IBM SPSS (25th ed.). Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Hsu, A., Esty, D. C., Levy, M. A., & de Sherbinin, A. (2016). 2016 Environmental Performance Index. Yale Center for Environmental Law & Policy. https://epi.yale.edu/

Hsu, A., et al. (2016). The environmental performance index: A global assessment of environmental sustainability. Sustainability Science, 11(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-015-0340-0

Kauffmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastrorillo, M. (2010). Growth without governance (World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 5397). https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-5397

KPMG. (2020). The future of sustainability reporting: A global perspective. KPMG International. https://home.kpmg/xx/en/home/insights/2020/01/future-of-sustainability-reporting.html

North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Cambridge University Press.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019). The future of productivity: The role of innovation and technology. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/innovation/the-future-of-productivity-9789264312000-en.htm

Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. Harvard University Press.

Raworth, K. (2017). Doughnut economics: Seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. Chelsea Green Publishing.

Rodrik, D. (2000). Institutions for high-quality growth: What they are and how to acquire them. Studies in Comparative International Development, 35(3), 3–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02699725

Sachs, J. D. (2015). The age of sustainable development. Columbia University Press.

Sachs, J. D., Kroll, C., Lafortune, G., Fuller, G., & Woelm, F. (2021). Sustainable development report 2021: The decade of action for the sustainable development goals. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009106559

Stern, N. (2007). The economics of climate change: The Stern review. Cambridge University Press.

Stiglitz, J. E., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J. P. (2010). Mismeasuring our lives: Why GDP doesn't add up. The New Press.

United Nations Environment Programme. (2019). Global environment outlook – GEO-6: Healthy planet, healthy people. United Nations Environment Programme. https://www.unep.org/resources/global-environment-outlook-6

United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. United Nations. https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda

World Bank. (2021). World development indicators. World Bank. https://databankfiles.worldbank.org/public/ddpext/

Zarghami, S. A. (2025). The role of economic policies in achieving sustainable development goal 7: Insights from OECD and European countries. Applied Energy, 377, 124558.

Zeng, S., et al. (2018). The impact of economic growth on environmental performance: Evidence from China. Sustainability, 10(4), 1234. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10041234

Downloads

Published

2025-11-04

How to Cite

Anum Nuryani, Anggun Anggraini, & Andika Prasetya. (2025). The Role of GDP in Changing the Influence of Enviromental and Politic on SDG. International Journal of Economics and Management Sciences, 1(1), 29–39. https://doi.org/10.61132/ijems.v1i1.1022