The Impact of Performance Measurement Systems on Employee Motivation and Productivity at Indonesia’s Defense University

Tatar Bonar Silitonga; Aloysius Sabon Payon; Damianus Manesi

doi:10.61132/ijema.v2i2.616

Authors

Tatar Bonar Silitonga Universitas Pertahanan
Aloysius Sabon Payon Universitas Pertahanan
Damianus Manesi Universitas Nusa Cendana https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2954-8603

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61132/ijema.v2i2.616

Keywords:

Performance Measurement System, Work Motivation, Employee Productivity, SEM, Faculty of Military Logistics Indonesia Defense University

Abstract

This ponder analyzes the impact of execution estimation framework on work inspiration and representative efficiency at the Staff of Military Coordinations, Indonesia Defense College, and tests the intervening part of work inspiration. The inquire about strategy employments a quantitative approach with a study of 125 respondents (teachers, scholastic staff, and bolster staff). Information were analyzed utilizing SEM. The comes about appeared that the execution estimation framework incorporates a positive and noteworthy impact on work inspiration (Î² = 0.52, p < 0.001), and work inspiration encompasses a positive impact on representative efficiency (Î² = 0.64, p < 0.001). Work inspiration moreover altogether intercedes the relationship between execution estimation framework and worker efficiency (Î² = 0.33, p < 0.01). This finding bolsters Self-Determination hypothesis which emphasizes the significance of satisfying mental must increment natural inspiration. Show approval through the goodness-of-fit test appeared a great fit with the observational information (Chi-Square/df = 2.15, RMSEA = 0.06, CFI = 0.95, TLI = 0.93). For all intents and purposes, this ponder suggests an moved forward execution estimation framework that's more transparent and reasonable to extend worker inspiration and efficiency. The investigate suggestions give hypothetical and commonsense commitments to the advancement of execution administration within the military and comparative organizations.

Downloads

References

A. B. Bakker and E. Demerouti, “Job demands–resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward,” J. Occup. Health Psychol., vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 273–285, 2017, doi: 10.1037/ocp0000056.

U. S. Bititci, P. Garengo, V. Dörfler, and S. S. Nudurupati, “Performance measurement: Challenges for tomorrow,” Int. J. Manag. Rev., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 305–327, 2012, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00318.x.

J. W. Creswell and J. D. Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 5th ed. SAGE Publica-tions, 2018.

S. Dalati and J. Gomes, Surveys and Questionnaires. Springer, 2018, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-74173-4.

A. S. DeNisi and C. E. Smith, “Performance appraisal, performance management, and firm-level performance: A review, a proposed model, and new directions for future research,” Acad. Manag. Ann., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 127–179, 2014, doi: 10.5465/19416520.2014.873178.

P. F. Drucker, Management Challenges for the 21st Century. HarperBusiness, 1999.

A. Ferreira and D. Otley, “The design and use of performance management systems: An extended framework for analysis,” Manag. Account. Res., vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 263–282, 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.mar.2009.07.003.

M. Gagné and E. L. Deci, Eds., The Oxford Handbook of Work Engagement, Motivation, and Self-Determination Theory. Oxford Univer-sity Press, 2014.

P. Garengo and S. Biazzo, “From ISO quality standards to an integrated management system: An implementation process in SMEs,” Total Qual. Manag. Bus. Excell., vol. 24, no. 3–4, pp. 310–335, 2013, doi: 10.1080/14783363.2012.704282.

J. F. Hair, B. J. Babin, R. E. Anderson, and W. C. Black, Multivariate Data Analysis, 8th ed. Cengage Learning, 2022.

R. S. Kaplan and D. P. Norton, The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action. Harvard Business School Press, 1996.

Labudo, “Disiplin kerja dan kompensasi pengaruhnya terhadap produktivitas karyawan,” J. EMBA: J. Riset Ekon. Manaj. Bisnis Akuntansi, vol. 1, no. 1, 2013. [Online]. Available: https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/emba/article/view/1372

A. P. Mangkunegara, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Perusahaan. PT Remaja Rosdakarya, 2015.

A. Neely, M. Gregory, and K. Platts, “Erratum,” Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag., vol. 25, no. 12, pp. 1228–1263, 2005, doi: 10.1108/01443570510633639.

E. Rulianti and G. Nurpribadi, “Pengaruh motivasi kerja, lingkungan kerja, dan pengembangan karir terhadap kepuasan kerja karyawan,” Jesya (J. Ekon. dan Ekon. Syariah), vol. 6, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.36778/jesya.v6i1.1011.

M. Santos and M. Lorenzo, “Contemporary performance measurement systems: A review of their consequences and a frame-work for research,” Manag. Account. Res., vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 79–119, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.mar.2012.04.001.

T. B. Silitonga, “Lecturer leadership in influencing learning class members faced with the COVID-19 pandemic conditions,” Int. J. Sci. Soc., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 330–351, 2021.

T. B. Silitonga, B. Sujanto, M. R. Luddin, E. Endri, and U. M. Buana, “Evaluation of overseas field study program at the In-donesia Defense,” J. Pendidikan, vol. 12, no. 10, 2024.

J. Soeters and P. M. Shields, Eds., Handbook of the Sociology of the Military. Springer, 2006.

L. Wong, P. D. Bliese, and D. McGurk, “Military leadership: A context-specific review,” Leadersh. Q., vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 657–692, 2003, doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.08.001.