Accountability and Transparency in Regional Budget Management for Good Governance

Authors

  • Mursalin Mursalin Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi YAPPI
  • Khaeriyah Khaeriyah Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi YAPPI

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62951/ijecm.v2i4.991

Keywords:

Accountability, Good Governance, Public Administration, Regional Budget, Transparency

Abstract

Regional budget management constitutes a critical foundation for achieving good governance in the era of decentralization and regional autonomy. This article comprehensively examines the pivotal role of accountability and transparency as essential instruments in enhancing the quality of regional budget governance. Employing a qualitative research methodology through systematic literature review and policy analysis, this study investigates the conceptual framework, implementation mechanisms, and practical implications of accountability and transparency principles in regional financial management. The findings reveal that robust implementation of accountability mechanisms—including financial reporting systems, internal and external oversight, and performance measurement—coupled with comprehensive transparency practices through information disclosure, public participation, and digital technology utilization, significantly contribute to strengthening institutional legitimacy, enhancing budget allocation efficiency, and preventing corruption. The research identifies that accountability is operationalized through multiple layers including legal compliance, procedural adherence, program effectiveness, and policy justification, while transparency manifests through open access to budget documents, participatory planning processes, and technology-enabled information systems. However, the study also uncovers substantial implementation challenges encompassing limited human resource capacity in financial management, inadequate inter-agency coordination, varying levels of public financial literacy and participation, and disparities in technological infrastructure between urban and rural areas. These challenges necessitate a multi-dimensional approach to reform. The article proposes evidence-based policy recommendations including systematic capacity building programs for government apparatus, strengthening regulatory frameworks with effective enforcement mechanisms, community empowerment through financial literacy initiatives, strategic investment in integrated digital platforms, and fostering collaborative partnerships among government institutions, legislative bodies, oversight agencies, civil society organizations, and citizens.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Achmad, T., & Hapsari, D. W. (2021). The impact of financial transparency on public trust in local government: Evidence from Indonesian regencies. Journal of Public Administration and Governance, 11(2), 145–162.

Afriyanti, H., Sabanu, H., & Juliani, D. (2020). Digital transformation and budget transparency in Indonesian local gov-ernments. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 33(6), 697–714. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-09-2019-0233

Anessi-Pessina, E., Sicilia, M., & Steccolini, I. (2023). Accounting, accountability, and transparency in public sector: Current trends and future directions. Public Money & Management, 43(4), 301–310.

Bastian, I. (2022). Contemporary public sector accounting: Theory and practice in Indonesia (5th ed.). Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Government Regulation Number 12 of 2019 on Regional Financial Management.

Halim, A., & Damayanti, T. (2023). Regional financial management in the digital era: Accountability and transparency perspectives. Yogyakarta: UPP STIM YKPN.

Indrawijaya, S., & Nurmalasari, Y. (2022). E-government and budget transparency: A study of Indonesian local gov-ernments. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 44(3), 178–195.

Lestari, A. K., Putri, I. G., & Setiawan, D. (2021). The role of civil society in enhancing budget accountability: Indonesian experience. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 14(2), 223–240.

Mahmudi. (2021). Public sector financial management: Contemporary issues and challenges. Yogyakarta: UPP STIM YKPN.

Mardiasmo. (2020). Public sector accounting: Recent developments and applications (6th ed.). Yogyakarta: Andi Publisher.

Meijer, A., & Worthy, B. (2024). Understanding the relationship between transparency and accountability in digital gov-ernment. Government Information Quarterly, 41(1), 101–118.

Ministry of Finance Republic of Indonesia. (2023). Evaluation report on regional financial management performance 2022. Jakarta: Directorate General of Fiscal Balance.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2022). Public financial management and budgeting practices: Good governance and anti-corruption. Paris: OECD Publishing.

Piotrowski, S. J., & Borry, E. L. (2020). Transparency and accountability in the public sector: Evolving paradigms and emerging challenges. Public Administration Review, 80(5), 731–742.

Republic of Indonesia. (2014). Law Number 23 of 2014 on Regional Government.

Riyanto, S., & Widiastuti, H. (2023). Budget accountability and corruption prevention in Indonesian local governments: A quantitative analysis. Journal of Financial Crime, 30(2), 445–462.

Sujarweni, V. W. (2021). Regional financial accounting and reporting: Implementation of government accounting standards (3rd ed.). Yog-yakarta: Pustaka Baru Press.

Supreme Audit Agency of Indonesia (BPK). (2024). Summary of Semester I audit results for fiscal year 2023. Jakarta: BPK-RI.

United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2023). Digital governance and public financial management: Best practices from Asia-Pacific. Bangkok: UNDP Regional Office.

World Bank. (2022). Public expenditure and financial accountability (PEFA): Strengthening PFM systems in developing countries. Washington, DC: The World Bank Group.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-17

How to Cite

Mursalin Mursalin, & Khaeriyah Khaeriyah. (2025). Accountability and Transparency in Regional Budget Management for Good Governance. International Journal of Economics, Commerce, and Management, 2(4), 140–148. https://doi.org/10.62951/ijecm.v2i4.991