Impact of Risk Management on Financial Performance : Moderating Role of GCG Self-Assessment

Authors

  • Antika Yusnia Politeknik Negeri Semarang
  • Mohamad Hasanudin Politeknik Negeri Semarang
  • Kenneth Pinandhito Politeknik Negeri Semarang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62951/ijecm.v2i3.600

Keywords:

Financial-Performance, Operational-Risk, Credit-Risk, Liquidity-Risk, GCG-Self-Assessment

Abstract

This study uses GCG self-assessment as a moderating variable to investigate how risk management, in particular operational, credit, and liquidity risk, affects financial performance. utilizing secondary and quantitative data from the websites of the Financial Services Authority (OJK) and each Rural Bank (BPR) for the 2019–2023 timeframe. Purposive sampling was the approach utilized to acquire the study's sample. There are 17 rural banks included in the sample size. The Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) approach and the SmartPLS 3.2.9 analysis tool are used in research data processing. The findings of the study demonstrate that operational risk significantly and negatively impacts financial performance. Liquidity risk has a positive but not significant effect on financial performance, while credit risk has a negative impact. This study also discovered that while GCG self-assessment was able to moderate the association between credit risk and financial performance, it was unable to moderate the relationship between financial performance and operational risk or liquidity risk.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anisa HV, Suryandari D. The Effect of NPL, GCG Self Assessment, ROA, and CAR on Firm Value (Empirical Study on Commercial Banks listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange). Accounting Finance Studies. 2021;1(2):111–124.

Aprila NW, Suryandari NNA, Arie AAPGB. Pengaruh Good Corporate Governance Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Perusahaan. Kumpulan Hasil Riset Mahasiswa Akuntansi. 2022;4(2):136–146.

Aryfudin M, Mulyadi M. Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Return on Asset. ADVANCE. 2020;7(1):56–63.

Asysidiq KM, Sudiyatno B. Pengaruh CAR, NPL, LDR, GDP dan Inflasi Terhadap ROA Pada Bank Umum Swasta Nasional Devisa yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode 2017–2021. Jurnal Mirai Management. 2022;7(2):66–84.

Bailusy MN, Taslim FATA, Subandiyah N. Pengaruh CAR, NPL, LDR, NIM dan BOPO terhadap Kinerja Keuangan dengan GCG sebagai Variabel Moderasi. Jurnal Manajemen Sinergi. 2019;7(1):52–64.

Dewanti AS, Van Rate P, Untu VN. Pengaruh CAR, LDR, NPL, dan BOPO terhadap ROA pada BPR Konvensional di Surakarta Periode 2015–2020. Jurnal EMBA. 2022;10(3):246–256.

Izdihar S, Hasan A, Azlina N. Pengaruh Penerapan Manajemen Risiko terhadap Kinerja Keuangan dengan Dimoderasi Good Corporate Governance. Jurnal Ekonomi. 2017;25(2):71.

Mangantar M, Tulung JE. Pengaruh CAR, BOPO, NIM, dan NPL terhadap ROA Industri Bank Umum Swasta Nasional Buku 3 Periode 2014–2018. Jurnal EMBA. 2019;7(3).

Nazariyah S, Roni M, Kusrini NAR. Pengaruh Manajemen Risiko dengan Good Corporate Governance sebagai Variabel Moderating terhadap Kinerja Keuangan BRI Syariah Periode 2015–2019. Journal of Islamic Banking. 2021;2(1):24–54.

Ningrum SA. Analisis Pengaruh BOPO, NPL dan LDR Terhadap Return Saham Melalui ROA pada Sektor Perbankan yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2015–2020. Jurnal Sosial Teknologi. 2021;1(10):1218–1233.

Noor AM, Sparta S. Pengaruh Risiko Kredit, Risiko Operasional, dan Risiko Likuiditas terhadap Kinerja Keuangan pada Bank Pembangunan Daerah di Indonesia Sebelum dan Pada Masa Pandemi COVID-19. Journal of Accounting, Management Islamic Economics. 2023;1(1):51–68.

Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 18/POJK.03/2016 tentang Penerapan Manajemen Risiko bagi Bank Umum. 2016. Tersedia dari: https://ojk.go.id/id/regulasi/Pages/POJK-tentang-Penerapan-Manajemen-Resiko-bagi-Bank-Umum.aspx

Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. POJK Nomor 4/POJK.03/2015 tentang Penerapan Tata Kelola bagi Bank Perkreditan Rakyat. 2015. Tersedia dari: https://ojk.go.id/id/regulasi/Pages/POJK-tentang-Penerapan-Tata-Kelola-bagi-Bank-Perkreditan-Rakyat.aspx

Rembet WE, Baramuli DN. Pengaruh CAR, NPL, NIM, BOPO, LDR Terhadap Return on Asset (ROA). Jurnal EMBA. 2020;8(3).

Runis A. Analisis Kinerja Keuangan Bank Syariah yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI) Periode Tahun 2015–2018. Jurnal Mirai Management. 2020;5(2).

Setyarini A. Analisis Pengaruh CAR, NPL, NIM, BOPO, LDR Terhadap ROA. Research Fair Unisri. 2020;4(1).

Silitonga RN, Manda GS. Pengaruh Risiko Kredit dan Risiko Likuiditas terhadap Kinerja Keuangan pada Bank BUMN Periode 2015–2020. Jurnal Maksipreneur. 2022;12(1):22–32.

Simatupang AL, Prabowo TJW. Analisis Rasio Keuangan (CAMEL) terhadap Kinerja Keuangan BPD dengan GCG sebagai Pemoderasi Periode 2017–2019. Diponegoro Journal of Accounting. 2021;10(4).

Sugiartha IMR, Antari NLS, Santika IP. Pengaruh Risiko Kredit, Risiko Likuiditas, Risiko Operasional terhadap Profitabilitas (Pada PT. BPR Maha Bhoga Marga). Journal of Applied Management Studies. 2021;2(2):121–133.

Sukma N, Saerang IS, Tulung JE. Pengaruh Dana Pihak Ketiga, Risiko Kredit, Risiko Pasar dan Risiko Operasional terhadap Profitabilitas pada Bank Kategori Buku 2 Periode 2014–2017. Jurnal EMBA. 2019;7(3).

Susanti LSL, Yuliansyah Y, Robin R. Pengaruh Penyisihan Penghapusan Aset Produktif, Non Performing Loan, Biaya Operasional Penghasilan Operasional terhadap Kinerja Keuangan dengan Good Corporate Governance sebagai Variabel Moderating pada Bank Perkreditan Rakyat di Kota Batam. Measurement Jurnal Akuntansi. 2023;17(2):273–282.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-04

How to Cite

Antika Yusnia, Mohamad Hasanudin, & Kenneth Pinandhito. (2025). Impact of Risk Management on Financial Performance : Moderating Role of GCG Self-Assessment. International Journal of Economics, Commerce, and Management, 2(3), 135–148. https://doi.org/10.62951/ijecm.v2i3.600