The Effects of Product Variety and Price Perception on Purchase Decisions: Evidence from ROSCA Tumbler Consumers on the Shopee Marketplace

Authors

  • Aini Nabilah Marzuq Universitas Dr. Soetomo
  • Damajanti Sri Lestari Universitas Dr. Soetomo
  • Liling Listyawati Universitas Dr. Soetomo
  • Dian Ferriswara Universitas Dr. Soetomo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62951/ijecm.v3i1.1117

Keywords:

Online Marketplace, Price Perception, Product Variety, Purchase Decision, Shopee

Abstract

The rapid growth of digital marketplaces has fundamentally transformed consumer decision-making processes by intensifying price transparency, product comparability, and information exposure. In highly competitive marketplace environments, consumers are frequently confronted with numerous product alternatives and dynamic pricing structures, which shape how they evaluate options and ultimately decide to purchase. This study examines the effects of product variety and price perception on consumers’ purchase decisions in the context of ROSCA tumbler products sold on the Shopee marketplace. Using a quantitative explanatory approach, this research employs a survey-based design to analyze the relationships among variables and to estimate their relative effects through multiple linear regression analysis. Data were collected from 100 respondents who had previously purchased ROSCA tumblers on Shopee, selected using purposive sampling based on predefined criteria. The research instrument consisted of 15 Likert-scale items measuring product variety, price perception, and purchase decision. Data analysis included descriptive statistics, instrument validity and reliability testing, regression assumption diagnostics, and hypothesis testing using both partial (t-test) and simultaneous (F-test) procedures. The findings reveal that product variety has a positive and significant effect on purchase decisions, indicating that consumers are more likely to finalize purchases when they perceive product options as sufficiently diverse, relevant, and comparable. Price perception also exerts a positive and significant influence and demonstrates a stronger relative effect compared to product variety. This result underscores the central role of perceived price fairness, competitiveness, and value-for-money in shaping purchase decisions within transparent and highly competitive marketplace settings. Simultaneously, product variety and price perception explain a substantial proportion of variance in purchase decisions, highlighting their combined importance as key marketing stimuli. These findings contribute to the literature on digital consumer behavior by providing empirical evidence from a specific marketplace–product context and offer practical implications for sellers and brand managers in optimizing assortment design and pricing strategies to enhance conversion rates in online marketplaces

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmed, S. K. (2024). How to choose a sampling technique and determine sample size for research: A simplified guide for researchers. Oral Oncology Reports, 12, 100662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oor.2024.100662

Alderighi, M., Nava, C. R., Calabrese, M., Christille, J.-M., & Salvemini, C. B. (2022). Consumer perception of price fairness and dynamic pricing: Evidence from Booking.com. Journal of Business Research, 145, 769–783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.03.017

Chu, L., Bai, S., Shi, F., Wei, W., & Song, J. (2025). Less pains and more gains: An experimental study of the impact of price transparency of vacation packages on purchase intention. Current Psychology, 44, 2532–2547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-07157-0

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Field, A. (2024). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Ghosh, M. (2024). Meta-analytic review of online purchase intention: Conceptualising the study variables. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), 2296686. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2296686

Gorton, M., Marek-Andrzejewska, E., Pang, G., Andrzejewski, W., & Lin, Y. (2024). Users’ processing of online marketplace listings for high and low involvement goods. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 65, 101382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2024.101382

Hair, J. F., Jr., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Black, W. C. (2022). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Hanaysha, J. R., Ramadan, H. I., & Alhyasat, K. M. K. (2025). Exploring the impact of customer reviews, website quality, perceived service quality, and product assortment on online purchase intention: The mediating role of trust. Telematics and Informatics Reports, 19, 100236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teler.2025.100236

Heo, C. Y., Kim, B., Park, K., & Back, R. M. (2022). A comparison of Best–Worst Scaling and Likert scale methods on peer-to-peer accommodation attributes. Journal of Business Research, 148, 368–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.04.064

Huh, I., & Gim, J. (2025). Exploration of Likert scale in terms of continuous variable with parametric statistical methods. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 25(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-025-02668-1

IBM. (2024, April 1). How to cite IBM SPSS Statistics or earlier versions of SPSS. https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/how-cite-ibm-spss-statistics-or-earlier-versions-spss

Kalnins, A., & Hill, K. P. (2025). The VIF score: What is it good for? Absolutely nothing. Organizational Research Methods, 28(1), 58–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/10944281231216381

Kang, H. (2021). Sample size determination and power analysis using the G*Power software. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, 18, 17. https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2021.18.17

Koo, T. K., & Yang, K. (2025). Likert-type scale. Encyclopedia, 5(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia5010018

Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2016). Marketing management (15th ed.). Pearson Education.

Long, X., Sun, J., Dai, H., Zhang, D., Zhang, J., Chen, Y., Hu, H., & Zhao, B. (2025). The choice overload effect in online recommender systems. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 27(1), 249–268. https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2022.0659

Mejía, V. D., Aurier, P., & Huaman-Ramirez, R. (2021). Disentangling the respective impacts of assortment size and alignability on perceived assortment variety. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 59, 102386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102386

Midway, S. R., & White, J. W. (2025). Testing for normality in regression models: Mistakes abound (but may not matter). Royal Society Open Science, 12(4), 241904. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.241904

Pham, T., Mathmann, F., Septianto, F., & Chylinski, M. (2025). The impact of assortment size and population density on product evaluation. Journal of Retailing, 101(2), 227–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2025.02.004

Phan Tan, L., & Le, T.-H. (2023). The influence of perceived price and quality of delivery on online repeat purchase intention: Evidence from Vietnamese purchasers. Cogent Business & Management, 10(1), 2173838. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2173838

Polat, Ş., Eskici, G. T., & Şen, H. T. (2025). A validity and reliability study of the performance appraisal motivation scale in a Turkish sample. BMC Nursing, 24, Article 71. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-03671-z

Qin, C.-X., & Liu, Z. (2022). Reference price effect of partially similar online products in the consideration stage. Journal of Business Research, 152, 70–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.06.043

Qiu, K., & Zhang, L. (2024). How online reviews affect purchase intention: A meta-analysis across contextual and cultural factors. Data and Information Management, 8(2), 100058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dim.2023.100058

Rosário, A., & Raimundo, R. (2021). Consumer marketing strategy and e-commerce in the last decade: A literature review. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 16(7), 3003–3024. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer16070164

Senali, M. G., Iranmanesh, M., Ghobakhloo, M., Foroughi, B., Asadi, S., & Rejeb, A. (2024). Determinants of trust and purchase intention in social commerce: Perceived price fairness and trust disposition as moderators. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 64, 101370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2024.101370

Soleimani, M. (2022). Buyers’ trust and mistrust in e-commerce platforms: A synthesizing literature review. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 20(1), 57–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-021-00545-0

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2021). Using multivariate statistics (7th ed.). Pearson Education.

Tian, X., Jiang, H., & Zhao, X. (2024). Product assortment and online sales in community group-buying channel: Evidence from a convenience store chain. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 79, 103838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.103838

Wang, C., Liu, T., Zhu, Y., Wang, H., Wang, X., & Zhao, S. (2023). The influence of consumer perception on purchase intention: Evidence from cross-border e-commerce platforms. Heliyon, 9(11), e21617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21617

Zhang, C., Pan, S., & Zhao, Y. (2024). More is not always better: Examining the drivers of livestream sales from an information overload perspective. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 77, 103651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103651

Zhang, H., Zheng, S., & Zhu, P. (2024). Why are Indonesian consumers buying on live streaming platforms? Research on consumer perceived value theory. Heliyon, 10(13), e33518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33518

Downloads

Published

2026-01-19

How to Cite

Aini Nabilah Marzuq, Damajanti Sri Lestari, Liling Listyawati, & Dian Ferriswara. (2026). The Effects of Product Variety and Price Perception on Purchase Decisions: Evidence from ROSCA Tumbler Consumers on the Shopee Marketplace. International Journal of Economics, Commerce, and Management, 3(1), 84–97. https://doi.org/10.62951/ijecm.v3i1.1117